Trudeau Promises Retaliation Against US Tariffs
3 hours ago
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 11:32 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
# Total spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will exceed $1 trillion February/March 2010.
# From FY 2001 to FY 2008, federal grants to state and local governments increased 0.57% for every 1% increase in total federal budget authority. Yet, during the same period, federal military expenditures increased 1.47% for every 1% in total federal budget authority.
In other words, as the “budgetary pie” increased, the defense slice got bigger and fatter and the “grants to the states” slice of the pie got smaller .
# Even without including current war allocations, U.S. military spending is at its highest level since World War II. This takes into account the war-time budgets of Vietnam and Korea.
# Despite rhetoric to the contrary, the Obama Administration is not cutting defense. In fact, the Pentagon budget is projected to grow25% over the next decade.
# This is an unprecedented period in our nation’s history. Two wars, staggering national debt, the economic crisis and an impending climate crisis make these extremely challenging times. At the same time, President Obama endeavors to respond to the sweeping mandate for change. [In Full, PDF format]
Meanwhile, in Pakistan US drones killed 12 persons in Waziristan. The dead included local commanders of the Pakistan Taliban Movement, along with some unidentified foreigners (typically foreigners associated with the Pakistani Taliban are either Arabs or regional Muslim radicals-- from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan or Xianjian). One of the strikes was on Dandey Darpakhel village, the site of a seminary linked to Siraj Haqqani, the son of old-time warlord Jalaluddin Haqqani, whose network in neighboring Afghanistan targets NATO and Afghan troops....and just in case you thought the Afghan government was happy about our military presence in their country, professor Cole continues:
ABC News reports [Link] that many high Afghan officials are opposed to the idea of the US sending more foreign troops to Afghanistan. [In Full, and much more at Informed Comment]
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 11:01 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 14:35 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
Honduras Coup Update from CEPR: "Honduras Coup Regime Suspends Constitutional Rights, Closes Media, Threatens Brazil:"The Honduran coup leaders say they will 'close down' the Brazilian embassy if they don't turn over Honduras legitimate president holed up inside. The coup government is chemically and physically harassing the embassy and it's staff with tear gas, noxious chemicals, and LRAD acoustic weapons.
Washington, D.C. - The Honduran de facto regime suspended constitutional guarantees to civil liberties, including freedom of assembly and freedom of the press, for 45 days on the eve of mass protests planned to mark the three-month anniversary since the coup d'etat against President Manuel Zelaya took place. The regime has also shut down Radio Globo, a prominent independent media outlet that has covered anti-coup activities and that reportedly has a journalist inside the Brazilian embassy where Zelaya is staying, and TV station Channel 36.
.
.
.
The regime also issued an ultimatum to Brazil over the weekend, warning the Brazilian government that it has 10 days to decide what to do about Zelaya, and a regime spokesperson warned that since Brazil broke off diplomatic relations with the coup government, it could remove the flag and shield from the Brazilian embassy, making it a "private office." Brazilian President Lula da Silva rejected the threats, saying that his government "doesn't accept ultimatums from coup-plotters."
[More @ CommonDreams]
(Xinhua) -- Ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya denounced on Friday that the country"s interim government harassed him and the people who are staying with him at the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa with toxic gases.A skeptical report, and in THIS Buffalo's opinion uneducated one (the author's statement about the hows and whys of LRADS shows a certain lack of knowledge of even the most elementary physics of sound, along with other flaws in his logical assumptions) appears at TPMuckraker, which bristles at the thought that the Honduran president partially blames Israel, despite the known fact that Israel is one of the LARGEST weapons merchants in Latin America. TIME Magazine, from 1983, on the topic.
Zelaya told a press conference that the interim government was strongly harassing him and the people inside the Brazilian embassy with toxic gases and a strong noise, which has affected his health and that of the other people with him.
Zelaya showed pictures of the policemen setting the device and placing bags with the toxic liquid.
Zelaya urged the international community "to make a strong pressure, to take measure for this bombing against the embassy and our health not to continue."
Doctors who took blood samples of the people inside the Brazilian embassy said that they had a high concentration of ammoniac, hydrogen of cyanide, which blocks the breathing system, produces vomit and abdominal ache. [In Full]
Although not nearly as important to Honduras as is the United States--which alone supplied 73 percent of the arms that Honduras imported from 1984 to 1988--Israel has also been a noteworthy provider of training and sophisticated weaponry to the Armed Forces of Honduras. A 1982 visit by a high-level Israeli delegation headed by (then) Defense Minister Ariel Sharon and Air Force General David Ivry, was followed by an increase in arms deliveries and training for Honduras. A dozen Israelis trained the Cobras (the elite counterinsurgency unit) and the personal security guards of former Honduran presidents Roberto Suazo Cordova and Jose Azcona Hoyo (see Public Security Force , this ch.). In mid-1983 the New York Times reported that significant quantities of weapons captured from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) by Israel in their 1982 invasion of Lebanon were passing through the Honduran armed forces to the Contras.
Brazil, France, Britain, and the former West Germany supplied about US$70 million worth of arms to Honduras between 1984 and 1988. The total in weapons sales deliveries from both foreign government and commercial sources was US$331.7 million during the years 1981 to 1990. [In Full]
The greatest illusionist spectacle in the world no longer enchants us. We are certain that communities of joy will emerge from our struggle, here and now.
And for the first time, life will triumph over death.
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now."
[Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 13:03 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
Disclaimer: This was written the night of September 24, immediately following the events described, without time to verify all the reports summarized or assemble additional information. There may be errors; if so, we will correct them shortly.UPDATE: September 25 2009, 1735 Pacific Daylight Time
This is on-the-spot reporting just in from the first day of the G20 summit in Pittsburgh, which has seen a great deal of spirited resistance and confrontation—perhaps as much as has occurred at any anarchist mobilization in North America in half a decade. This gushy, hastily composed account presents the context, attempts to convey the spirit of the day, and raises a few preliminary questions.
The basic narrative of the day runs thus: The protesters attempt to reach the summit site, but are brutally forced back by police. They eventually turn around and march through Pittsburgh neighborhoods and shopping districts, where the police pursue and attack them. Property destruction intensifies in response to these attacks, and the conflict culminates in a standoff between police and students during which a black bloc destroys a business district. [In Full @ CrimethInc]
A heads up: it seems either US federal police or the US military have used sonic weapons on protestors in Pittsburgh.The FBI is apparently producing some significant evidence leading to the indictment of a Denver shuttle bus driver Najibullah Zazi and some 'friends' who were allegedly actualizing some sort of terrorist act (with some "hoarded" chemical that haven't been found yet) in the U.S. even as two more plots, including a 15 year old Jordanian teen in Dallas Texas who planned to take down a 60 story skyscraper make news.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/military-attacks-american-citizens-with-sound-weapons-tear-gas-at-g20.html
National Guard, police, and other military units attacked American citizens with tear gas and deployed sound cannons today in response to an “unpermitted protest” as bedlam hit the streets on the first day of the G20 summit in downtown Pittsburgh.
The First Amendment is officially dead in the United States. If this isn’t martial law then we don’t know what is. Associated Press photographs show National Guard troops in full fatigues with active duty military running checkpoints that make the roadblocks in Iraq positively friendly. Like Iraq, America is now a conquered nation occupied by troops whose primary function is to oppress anyone who tries to express the freedoms that they once enjoyed.
It all unfolded live on The Alex Jones Show as the Infowars crew called in to the program as sound cannons were turned against protesters who police were attempting to force out of the immediate area. [In Full @ Seeker 401]
All 118 members of the Non-Aligned Movement have signed a statement declaring support for Iran's nuclear program. At least 7 non-members have also publicly expressed support (Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Turkey), bringing the total to at least 125.
So perhaps Iran is at risk of alienating an international minority, but certainly not the majority.[In Full @ The Ruh of Brown Folks]
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 10:32 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
“I’m not interested in just being in Afghanistan for the sake of being in Afghanistan or saving face or, in some way– you know, sending a message that America– is here for– for the duration,” (source)...but not ready to pull out of the country. Expect a decision within the next couple of weeks... More.
At the moment, US policy toward Afghanistan consists of several levels:Da Buffalo has a comment in regard to one detail mentioned about what the US is attempting to do in Afghanistan now that our back's against the "Both Feet In or GET OUT!" 'wall'.
# development aid
# state-building and giving the Kabul government greater bureaucratic capacity
This includes working to improve the civilian bureaucracy
As well as training up 400,000 military troops and police
# counter-insurgency-- defeating the guerrilla groups of Gulbadin Hikmatyar, Jalaluddin Haqqani, and Mulla Omar, in the eastern and southern Pashtun regions
# counter-terrorism -- destroying the small Arab terrorist cells that exist in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan, which security analysts fear are directing plots in London, New York, and so forth.
This multi-level approach is a disaster. You can't do development aid very effectively in a country beset by guerrilla violence. Moreover, counter-insurgency requires a legitimate, effective Afghan partner that can compete with the Taliban and their allies for Afghan hearts and minds. And, if counter-terrorism is really the goal, then you don't need a 60,000-man army in a country notoriously inhospitable to foreign armies.
The Obama administration seems to be considering whether these four levels can be usefully unentangled.
In particular, incumbent president Hamid Karzai's clumsy attempt to steal the election and his continued seeming inability really to take charge in the country he de jure rules, appears to have provoked the Obama team to wonder whether they could in fact work with Karzai.
Personally, I think Biden is right (Nb. More drones, less boots on the ground, focus on al Qaeda//Da Buffalo) and that if the administration will bet on him, they'd put us 2 or 3 years ahead of the curve.
I have for some time been saying that I can't imagine that what most Pashtuns really want is to have more US troops patrolling their villages...
[In Full]
"...working to improve the civilian bureaucracy..."
Apparently US foreign policy makers are ignoring the simple fact that the so-called "civilian bureaucracy" is a DIRECT THREAT to Afghanistan's culture and social system.
It's EXACTLY the reason (but undoubtedly not the only one) the Talib are so successful recruiting people and the US is being reduced to crass bribery, which BTW will work even worse, and make even MORE enemies, than it did in Iraq.
We're continually insulting these people in the name of our own self-interests.
In this case, the self-interest is what a "civilian bureaucracy" will garner us in the way of trade and resources, even more than an ally in the region, because the Afghan people will most likely hate us for a long, long time due to our government's childish, self-serving, arrogant attempt to, essentially culturally assimilate them from a distance.
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 11:51 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] Twitter This Commentary |
Escalation Scenarios: The Third World War and Its Aftermath
2009 SEPTEMBER 23
A world nuclear war is one that involves most or all nuclear powers releasing a large proportion of their nuclear weapons at targets in nuclear, and perhaps non-nuclear, states. Such a war could be initiated accidentally, aggressively or pre-emptively and could continue and spread through these means or by retaliation by a party attacked by nuclear weapons. While some speak of “limited nuclear war,” it is likely that any nuclear war will quickly escalate and spiral out of control because of the “use them or loose them” strategy. If you don’t use all your nuclear weapons you are likely to have them destroyed by the enemy’s nuclear weapons.
Such a war could start through a reaction to terrorist attacks, or through the need to protect against overwhelming military opposition, or through the use of small battle field tactical nuclear weapons meant to destroy hardened targets. It might quickly move on to the use of strategic nuclear weapons delivered by short-range or inter-continental missile or long-range bomber. These could deliver high altitude bursts whose electromagnetic pulse knocks out electrical circuits for hundreds of square miles. Or they could deliver nuclear bombs to destroys nuclear and/or non-nuclear military facilities, nuclear power plants, important industrial sites and cities. Or it could skip all those steps and start through the accidental or reckless use of strategic weapons.
Below are seven scenarios by which world nuclear war could come about. While these are some of the major scenarios and combination of attacks and retaliations, they are hardly exhaustive. U.S., Russian and other nuclear nations’ weapons strategizers deal with these scenarios every day but rarely let mere citizens in on their grizzly thinking. Citizens must end their denial and become aware of such scenarios.
GENERAL SCENARIOS
Accidental: Since the United States and Russia have “launch on warning” systems that send off rockets before it is confirmed a nuclear attack is underway, any tensions between them can lead to massive nuclear war within thirty minutes of a warning — no matter how false the warning may be.
Aggressive: One or more nations decides to use weapons against nuclear or non-nuclear nations in order to promote an economic, political or military goal, as part of an ongoing war or as a first strike nuclear attack. (The state , of course, may claim it is a pre-emptive, retaliatory or even accidental attack.)
Pre-emptive: One or more nations believes (correctly or incorrectly) or claims to believe that another nuclear nation is about to use nuclear weapons against its nuclear, military, industrial or civilian targets and pre-emptively attacks that nation. May result from political or military “brinkmanship.”
Retaliatory: Use of nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear attack — or even a conventional, chemical or biological attack by a non-nuclear nation.
ASSUMPTIONS OF THESE SCENARIOS
There is a whole body of knowledge and assumptions that is taken into account when putting together scenarios like the below. My bottom line assumption is that any nuclear exchange has an excellent chance of resulting in a series of escalations that will spiral out of control, setting off a round of exchanges among various enemies under a “use it or lose it” philosophy, as well as among the treaty allies of the relevant nuclear powers and their allies. This continues until most of the planets’ 20,000 odd nuclear weapons are exhausted. In making “limited nuclear war” calculations all nations should assume “whatever can go wrong, will go wrong.” Unfortunately, too many strategizers assume they can conduct limited strikes and keep them limited...
[In Full, Illustrated, @ PakAlert Press]
"All The News You Never Knew You Needed To Know ...Until Now." [Pop Out Player? Click Here] Prefer An MP3 Playlist? It's Here: [192kbps VBR 12:39 Minutes] Other Audio Formats Available [ Here ] More interesting facts about the New American Police State below the news synopsis... Twitter This Commentary |
Protesters make final G20 plans as Pittsburgh digs in
Agence France-Presse
September 20, 2009
Pittsburgh is beefing up security with thousands of extra police, as anti-globalization, anti-war, anti-government and anti-poverty activists descend on it for the G20 summit.
Protesters say they plan to air their opposition to “the undemocratic way in which the G20 operates and the decisions the group makes, which affect the more than six billion inhabitants of this planet.”
.
.
.
The fear in the minds of residents, officials and security forces is that violent demonstrations such as those seen in 1999 in Seattle — where protesters and riot police faced off for days, disrupting a meeting of the World Trade Organization — will mar this week’s G20 summit.
“I hope they’ll keep the protesters under control so Seattle doesn’t repeat itself,” said resident Nancy Provil.
Ravenstahl has said protesters will be allowed to exercise their constitutional freedom of speech and assembly “within sight and sound” of the summit venue.
It turns out this will be in a strictly delineated area outside of the downtown...
[In Full]
Prolonged stress from the CIA's harsh interrogations could have impaired the memories of terrorism suspects, diminishing their ability to recall and provide the detailed information the spy agency sought, a new scientific paper says.In other words, if this assumption is correct, the US government destroyed evidence and sabotaged their own case.
The methods could even have caused the suspects to create - and believe - false memories, contends the paper, which scrutinises the techniques used by the CIA under the Bush administration through the lens of neurobiology.
It suggests the methods are counterproductive, no matter how much suspects might eventually say.
[In Full]
I B Bad. I'm The 897,186,093 Richest Person On Earth! Discover how rich you are Here! |